furtech: (monster!)
[personal profile] furtech
Why is it that so many studios think that ugly, scabrous werewolves look more "real"? Being Human has werewolves, but it feels like they couldn't decide what was cool and what was doofy, so the final beasts look...awful. Imagine the Twilight werewolves with terminal cases of mange.

Here is the werewolf:
bhww1



It looks like one of those mange-ridden coyote carcasses that show up every so often as genuine "chupcabra". It is fat and lumpy and my first inclination is to take it to a vet. Why do they think that "mangey/scabrous=REALISTIC!!1!" ??? The coolest scene was where they used an actual dead werewolf prop--that was the one time any of them had any heft or weight to them. CG garbage.

I did some checking and found that the original British version of the show actually had a really nice werewolf design-- far different from the American one:
bhukww1

Wow-- a classic crinos-style, upright, not-too-mangey, not-scabrous werewolf! Neat!

More pics:
bhukww2

I have -no- idea if the British series is better than the American one (I get the impression the American/Canadian team "remade" the series to fit "American" tastes), but at least the werewolf is an actual practical effect-- classic rubber suit! Yes, I can predict that they have the same problem that the producers of "Werewolf" (the tv series from the 80's) had: totally cool looking werewolves, but without the budget to do full animatronic heads, so they looked great in stills, but kind of rigid on camera, leading to very quick cuts of the heads.


Still, I've enjoyed a lot of Brit series more than their American counterparts, so I'll be curious to see how they play out. Hopefully the Ghost is less annoying than in the American series. (SO ANNOYING!!)

Date: 2012-03-30 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] furtech.livejournal.com
Van Helsing had decent werewolves...too CGI, though.

Yeah, few have done the narrow-chested wolf-like werewolves (4 legged)...they all turn into pitbulls. Hairless, scabrous pitbulls.

I actually lean towards tails on werewolves, but no-tails makes more sense. It's an aesthetic thing, I think.

Date: 2012-03-30 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lironess.livejournal.com
No tails makes less sense to me...very very few mammals are tailless....and to me a tail is a very important part of any canine. And fur....nice thick sink you fingers into fur. At least husky fur....

I actually prefer the threian thing...they turn into actual real wolves....pound for pound no suddenly enormous 500 lbs wolves from 170 lb men....

But I guess it is hard to make "real" wolves behave like emo humans...so they go for somewhere in between and they look like shit,

Profile

furtech: (Default)
furtech

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 1st, 2026 11:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios