So tell me how all the artists who were previously hanging their artwork next to pieces depicting rape and other non-consentual acts (such as murder) are acting morally by leaving now- or is it just another case of furry drama?
Or for that matter why a site that is for the promotion of art (as much as furry stuff can be called art) should censor certain acts but leave other equally morally abhorrent acts in place?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-11-09 12:39 am (UTC)Or for that matter why a site that is for the promotion of art (as much as furry stuff can be called art) should censor certain acts but leave other equally morally abhorrent acts in place?