furtech: (Default)
furtech ([personal profile] furtech) wrote2005-08-31 12:09 pm

(no subject)

I'm not sure why this article made me so angry. But it did.

http://www.wildsentry.org/Dilemma.html

(Here's the website for the group: http://www.wildsentry.org/TeamBios.html )

[identity profile] pikacello.livejournal.com 2005-08-31 12:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I see...
I don't really know that much about wolves, so I can't really say as much as you can about it... but it sounds like a pretty pretentious article. Like the authors are trying to glorify themselves through their wolf.

[identity profile] furtech.livejournal.com 2005-08-31 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
You nailed it-- I think that's what bothers me. Vanity "pets". Apparently they got the wolf because a documentary film wanted to show what a "wolf ambassador" does (the wolves sanctuaries take to schools, etc. for educational purposes). So these nitwits got a wolf cub to raise just for this film...and didn't expect to have to take care of it afterwards (apparently the film maker said he'd take responsibility...yeah). As if there aren't dozens of legit sanctuaries and wolves around the country that could have been used instead. bleah.