furtech: (blank)
furtech ([personal profile] furtech) wrote2004-06-26 12:19 am

"I'm voting for Nader!"

This is bound to ruffle the feathers of many people. Everyone's all about, "Vote for Kerry because he isn't Bush." I have yet to see any good reasons that Kerry would make a good president.

I won't vote for someone just to vote against someone else: to do so is a perversion of what I see as the spirit of what a democracy is. I need to have a reason to vote *for* someone; not having a good chance to win is poor reason to -not- vote for someone. I could just as easily vote for the Libertarian or Green candidate-- is that just as bad? Our political system is built around *choice*. You can choose to vote for whomever for whatever reason-- but don't denigrate me for exercising my right to choose.

Two further things: the election is almost half a year away and a lot can happen between now and then. Second, I never reveal whom I voted for. I've voted in every single election since I could vote and I vote for the people I believe in. That's more than a lot of people can say.

[identity profile] shadowolf.livejournal.com 2004-06-26 10:48 am (UTC)(link)
I have to thank Cargo for the link, and it's appropriate to the discussion. A story about Republicans in Oregon pushing to get Nader on the ballot:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&e=3&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_el_pr/nader_convention

I'm pretty sure the Democrats would be doing the same if it were a moderate Republican, too.