ext_60044 ([identity profile] furtech.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] furtech 2012-08-06 09:35 am (UTC)

Actually, the "Spam Lite" has pretty decent numbers: about 1/3 fewer calories, half the fat and less sodium than regular (classic) Spam. I might give this a try: if it's similar in taste, it's a nice emergency (ie, too lazy or tired to go out and get food) meal.

Also: ingredients are a dangerous area for the weak-of-heart. I have to turn a blind eye to some of my favorite foods in this area (like, sausages...).

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting